Friday, July 2, 2010

Kagan questioned on depictions of animal cruelty case

While I did not write about it at the time, I was disappointed, but not surprised, by the Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. Stevens, which struck down the federal law prohibiting depictions of animal cruelty.  If you haven't had the chance to read it, I'd encourage you to at a minimum read Justice Alito's dissent.  The opinion is available from the Supreme Court's website at this link.  Justice Alito correctly criticized the majority's reliance on speculative and hypothetical cases that have not and would not be prosecuted under the law, such as hunting videos or depictions of animals being slaughtered for food.  Justice Alito focused his decision on addressing the actual case before the court that involved dog fighting videos and discussing the "crush videos' that the law was designed to combat.

I wanted to write a brief post now, because the decision came up again yesterday during the confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.  As Solicitor General, Kagan's office had defended the law, but during the hearing Kagan stated that the law was drafted in a way that made it difficult to defend from a First Amendment perspective.  Josh Gernstein at Politico notes that the questioning came from Orrin Hatch. While both Hatch and Kagan agreed on the difficulty of defending the statute based on the way it was drafted, Kagan also pointed to Justice Alito's dissenting opinion as proof that the arguments he office made in defending the law were not without merit. 

While it's impossible to say with any certainty, based on her comments, it's doubtful that Kagan would have been a second vote in favor of upholding the law had she been on the Court.  Nevertheless, there are moves afoot in Congress to revive the law and be more precise in its drafting in order to address any First Amendment concerns.  Hopefully, Kagan will be supportive of this new law in the event that it is challenged.


cetude said...

Actually-because the law makers chose cruelty over kindness reflects the downfall of civilization where torture and snuff is defended and mercy and compassion is deemed illegal and even frowned upon. In fact it is HIGHLY likely the human race will destroy itself into extinction within 10 years. The human race is no more. We are a race of savages, decadent and disgusting.

"Any society which does not insist upon respect for all life
must necessarily decay." --ALBERT EINSTEIN

ฟีฟ่า ยูโร said...

Sheriff confirmed The big tree in the middle of the word chitosan. Not a fig tree
Royal1688 It is an online casino site. Online Betting Sites The fun comes with follow up news. And on the morning of 28 October, Mr. Veerawat Wongsrirak, the sheriff of Ban Dung, told the "news family" in the case of large trees near the giant tree. And in the island of Cha-chod, the fallen tree that fell was a large banyan tree. It is not a giant. The large banyon fell down.

This caused the chopped tree roots to fall apart, and the police had assumed that the impact of floods for a long time from July to August ago. That makes the rowan of rotten pea. So the tree did not root, so they fell down.

It was also assigned to Col. Yosakorn Phetthalai, deputy district administrator. Coordinate with the Royal Forest Department to send officers to inspect the fallen banyan tree and the nearby chedi in the vicinity. And the other. The chedis in the area that tourists pass is that it is strong enough. To prevent damage that may occur from the felling of trees. By the authorities on the area of the Tonsai fall to prohibit waiting for the forest staff to check. Koh Chaidod is also open to the public to pay homage to his father Sri Suttho. You can read progress on the website. Royal1688

Eleanor Eiland said...

I will prefer this blog because it has much more informative stuff.
Scott Lanzon Attorney

Lauren A. Roney said...

I will prefer this blog because it has much more informative stuff.
Scott Lanzon Knoxville